Watching a Fox on FOX ...

[Snuffy]

Seems, Ms Palin has a new job ...

http://www.comcast.net/video/sarah-palin-takes-fox-news-job/1383084091

[CybrSlydr]

Sounds like a bit of "Preaching to the choir" to me.

[Burning Beard]

The "journalists" are gonna **** a brick. What do that say about her now, they cant say she got her job because she was a political figure... she was a journalism major. lol

Beard

[Toastmaker]

You may also take this as evidence that she has no intention of running for Prez.




:beach3: = :)

[Nausicaa]

Did I get that right ? Palin wants to work at Fox ?
What is that called? Bringing the pot to the kettle ?

[Mikha'el Ephraim]

Did I get that right ? Palin wants to work at Fox ?
What is that called? Bringing the pot to the kettle ?

No, she now works at Fox. A Fox at Fox! LOL!

[RickN]

Kind of smart move if you think about it. She gets to be heard by a huge amount of people without media filters, and when the MSM does try to twist what she says, the video will be online for all to see. Plus the added exposure will not hurt unless she says several really dumb things.

[Lucky Dog]

Kind of smart move if you think about it. She gets to be heard by a huge amount of people without media filters, and when the MSM does try to twist what she says, the video will be online for all to see. Plus the added exposure will not hurt unless she says several really dumb things.


You got it !!
No more lies and bull**** from the left or McCain people trying to save their reputations !

Had to put on a new coat of lipstick tonite.........

[Toastmaker]

Now that Rick mentions it that way. . . . I take back my pronouncement that she's not going to run -

We'll see -

:thumbs up:

[Snuffy]

I thought you might have been a bit shortsighted there Toastie ... :laugh:

This is definately what she needs. Along with everything Rick said, she'll also become overtly exposed to true internationsl affairs and increase her knowlege in those areas.

:beach3:

[bzhyoyo]

Sooooooo, if I get it right, Palin, a likely prospect for the Republican nomination for the next presidential election will be a columnist at Fox News... "Fair and balanced"?
(don't bother with the usual chorus of "that makes up for the rest of the media!" - I know the tune...)
Maybe she'll try to hyptonise the audience, seems to be what she was doing when she was young. :D
http://files.fluctuat.net/images/cms_flu/5/7/7/1/41775/51495.jpg

PS: I had never really noticed her small problem with eye convergence until I found this pic. I know... who cares?

[Toastmaker]

Sooooooo, if I get it right, Palin, a likely prospect for the Republican nomination for the next presidential election will be a columnist at Fox News... "Fair and balanced"?
(don't bother with the usual chorus of "that makes up for the rest of the media!" - I know the tune...)
Maybe she'll try to hyptonise the audience, seems to be what she was doing when she was young. :D
http://files.fluctuat.net/images/cms_flu/5/7/7/1/41775/51495.jpg

PS: I had never really noticed her small problem with eye convergence until I found this pic. I know... who cares?



To your credit - you're very quick to come to the correct conclusion. . .

[Snuffy]

... PS: I had never really noticed her small problem with eye convergence until I found this pic. ...

And that's a problem?, how?

[bzhyoyo]

I never said that was a problem... at least not for me! It's just that I had never noticed it before, that's all.
Actually, to be honest, I was a bit curious to see who would bite and jump to the "obviously" negative interpretation. ;)

[Snuffy]

That wasn't an "'obviously' negative interpretation".

I never said that it was a negative interpretation, I was just asking is all. :laugh:

[bzhyoyo]

I didn't say you jumped to the wrong conclusion, I just said that I was curious to see who would...
Yeah, I know, it can go on and on and on and on and on,... and on. :D

[Toastmaker]

Well, now you know.

No need to thank me.

[Mikha'el Ephraim]

Funny how many on the left/far left rail against Fox News for being the opposite of "Fair and Balanced" as they claim to be. But when you compared them to all the major networks and some of the offshoots, the media in general is way the hell far left but they try to claim their views are neutral. Give ME a break! Fox is the lone spot of ink on the blotter but appear to be the "irritant" rubbing the rest raw. Good for em!

As to Sarah Palin, personally I do not think she is going to run again. She actually has significant political capital to help steer a number of things. Even as such, the left obviously consider her a threat. If not, then why do they waste so much time and effort trying to tear her down?

[Trans_23]

Funny how many on the left/far left rail against Fox News for being the opposite of "Fair and Balanced" as they claim to be. But when you compared them to all the major networks and some of the offshoots, the media in general is way the hell far left but they try to claim their views are neutral. Give ME a break! Fox is the lone spot of ink on the blotter but appear to be the "irritant" rubbing the rest raw. Good for em!

As to Sarah Palin, personally I do not think she is going to run again. She actually has significant political capital to help steer a number of things. Even as such, the left obviously consider her a threat. If not, then why do they waste so much time and effort trying to tear her down?

I think everyone knows by now that they are not fair and balance but Fox is to the Right wingers that most of the rest of the media is to the left. They should adjust their motto to say something in the line of "Balance for the Right". The problem with the media anymore is you can't really trust what is being put out there or the silliest little thing is sensationalized. The news in Chicago always starts with the death toll for the day. Like I really give a **** if a gang banger or crack whore was found in a dumpster.


As far as Sarah Palin's capital you mention? Really? I don't see it. Not sure how the left thinks she is a threat but maybe they do. As long as she remains the butt of jokes I just don't see her as a serious candidate.

[Cameljockey]

Funny how many on the left/far left rail against Fox News for being the opposite of "Fair and Balanced" as they claim to be. But when you compared them to all the major networks and some of the offshoots, the media in general is way the hell far left but they try to claim their views are neutral. Give ME a break! Fox is the lone spot of ink on the blotter but appear to be the "irritant" rubbing the rest raw. Good for em!

As to Sarah Palin, personally I do not think she is going to run again. She actually has significant political capital to help steer a number of things. Even as such, the left obviously consider her a threat. If not, then why do they waste so much time and effort trying to tear her down?

I posted this somewhere else on the forum but can't seem to find it. Good read.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/the_wilding_of_sarah_palin.html

[Panthera Pardus Nigresco]

Interesting how this thread's subject is about looks and not about substance....

Anyways, this **could** be a move FOXNews regrets in the long-run.....We shall see though....

[Willy]

Cameljockey, I've read that article before and have to agree with most of it. The left doesn't want powerful women. They want women to be subservient.

[Trans_23]

Cameljockey, I've read that article before and have to agree with most of it. The left doesn't want powerful women. They want women to be subservient.

That is a pretty broad assumption.

[RickN]

More fitting, the left does not want powerful women on the right. That is what scares the crap out of them. Any time a women on the right starts gaining attention the left does their best to tear them down. Usually using crap they would have a fit about if it was said about a women on their side.

Panther as for looks over substance, it worked for Obama, why not Palin.

Seriously Palin has more substance and experience then Obama had before the election so the left pretty much threw that argument out the window. What he has done since the election is just reinforcing that point.

[Panthera Pardus Nigresco]

Panther as for looks over substance, it worked for Obama, why not Palin.



Because the thread isn't titled something like "Hunk Is President"... :)

But anyways, Palin still has yet to win me over as a Presidental candidate...

[RickN]

[SIZE="3"]

But anyways, Palin still has yet to win me over as a Presidental candidate...

That is OK, I feel the same about Obama.

[Toastmaker]

I heard a rumbling about Gingrich considering a run at the chair. I could really get behind a Gingrich/Palin ticket. . .

What a lefty nightmare !






:beach3: = :)

[Panthera Pardus Nigresco]

That is OK, I feel the same about Obama.

Really?
I hadn't noticed...;)

[Hans Jaeger]

Let's see how she does.

[RickN]

I heard a rumbling about Gingrich considering a run at the chair. I could really get behind a Gingrich/Palin ticket. . .

What a lefty nightmare !






:beach3: = :)


Newt has his good and his bad points being more interested in the party then the voters. I am not sure I could back him wholeheartedly.

[Snuffy]

Interesting how this thread's subject is about looks and not about substance ...


Oh ye of shallow mindedness.

There is more to this than the woman's physical appearance. Trust me.

[Panthera Pardus Nigresco]

Oh ye of shallow mindedness.

There is more to this than the woman's physical appearance. Trust me.

Then you should've titled the thread different...;)
Don't blame me for the title of YOUR thread.....:)

Or, please explain what you meant by naming this thread "Watching a Fox on Fox"...so I can be properly corrected... You've referred to Palin as a "Fox" in the title of this thread, so what does that mean??

[Panthera Pardus Nigresco]

Then you should've titled the thread different...;)
Don't blame me for the title of YOUR thread.....:)

Or, please explain what you meant by naming this thread "Watching a Fox on Fox"...so I can be properly corrected... You've referred to Palin as a "Fox" in the title of this thread, so what does that mean??

Tell you what Snuffy,
I'll give you a freebie and dig you out of your own hole here....

We'll just assume that you meant "Sly as a Fox"...And that way, I'll take the heat for your mistake :)

[Snuffy]

Tell you what Snuffy,
I'll give you a freebie and dig you out of your own hole here....

We'll just assume that you meant "Sly as a Fox"...And that way, I'll take the heat for your mistake :)

Ah Panther, and now you come to the point. There are more than one meaning for the term FOX!

You did good. :thumbs up:
And of course it wasn't my mistake in the use of the term, it WAS your mistake in understanding the term. :)

[Panthera Pardus Nigresco]

Ah nevermind...
Apparently once again I'm the only one in this forum who "man-ups" (as expected) to anything around here ....No problem, I'll take the heat yet again....